Vulnerability Database · npm · Package report
libp2p-crypto: vulnerability history, versions and safety
libp2p-crypto is a package in the npm ecosystem. Vulert holds no vulnerabilities for it yet.
Nothing recorded for this package in the npm ecosystem.
Every vulnerability has a patched version to move to.
No published version shipped hostile code.
Vulert verdict on libp2p-crypto 0.21.2 i
Updated on 23 Oct 2026
Good news: 0.21.2, the version you would install today, has no known vulnerabilities.
- Security Minor issues
- Maintenance Unmaintained
- Popularity Niche
- Community Quiet
What to do: Stay on 0.21.2 or newer. This can change: a vulnerability disclosed tomorrow can affect 0.21.2 too — Vulert watches the package and alerts you if that happens. Monitor it with Vulert →
- Current release 0.21.2 — unaffected i
- Vulnerabilities on record 0 i
- Highest CVSS n/a i
- With no published fix 0 i
- Depended on by 577 packages i
- Stars 79 i
- OpenSSF scorecard 2/10 i
- Last release 57 months ago i
- Licence MIT i
Version list, release dates, licence and dependants published by the npm registry, refreshed 23 Oct 2026. Licence information is not legal advice.
Concerned about your application's security?
Vulert continues monitoring your dependencies and alerts you when new vulnerabilities are disclosed. No installation and no source-code access required.
01 Versions
Which versions are affected
Every version Vulert tracks for libp2p-crypto, newest first, with the vulnerabilities recorded against each one. A version showing none has no vulnerability in the Vulert database — open it for the full picture on that release.
- 0.21.2 20 Jan 2022
- 0.21.1 18 Jan 2022
- 0.21.0 01 Dec 2021
- 0.20.0 21 Oct 2021
- 0.19.7 18 Aug 2021
- 0.16.4 30 Jul 2021
- 0.19.6 15 Jul 2021
- 0.19.5 07 Jul 2021
- 0.19.4 20 Apr 2021
- 0.19.3 11 Apr 2021
- 0.19.2 17 Mar 2021
- 0.19.1 15 Mar 2021
- 0.19.0 15 Jan 2021
- 0.18.0 07 Aug 2020
- 0.17.9 05 Aug 2020
- 0.17.8 20 Jul 2020
- 0.17.7 09 Jun 2020
- 0.17.6 07 Apr 2020
- 0.17.5 24 Mar 2020
- 0.17.4 23 Mar 2020
- 0.17.3 26 Feb 2020
- 0.17.2 17 Jan 2020
- 0.16.3 25 Oct 2019
- 0.17.1 25 Oct 2019
- 0.16.2 25 Sep 2019
- 0.17.0 11 Jul 2019
- 0.16.1 26 Feb 2019
- 0.16.0 08 Jan 2019
- 0.15.0 03 Jan 2019
- 0.14.1 05 Nov 2018
- 0.14.0 17 Sep 2018
- 0.13.0 05 Apr 2018
- 0.12.1 12 Feb 2018
- 0.12.0 27 Jan 2018
- 0.11.0 20 Dec 2017
- 0.10.4 01 Dec 2017
- 0.10.3 07 Sep 2017
- 0.10.2 06 Sep 2017
- 0.10.0 03 Sep 2017
- 0.9.4 22 Jul 2017
- 0.9.3 22 Jul 2017
- 0.9.2 22 Jul 2017
- 0.9.1 22 Jul 2017
- 0.9.0 22 Jul 2017
- 0.8.8 11 Apr 2017
- 0.8.7 21 Mar 2017
- 0.8.6 03 Mar 2017
- 0.8.5 11 Feb 2017
- 0.8.4 11 Feb 2017
- 0.8.3 11 Feb 2017
- 0.8.2 10 Feb 2017
- 0.8.1 09 Feb 2017
- 0.8.0 07 Feb 2017
- 0.7.7 27 Jan 2017
- 0.7.6 16 Jan 2017
- 0.7.5 13 Dec 2016
- 0.7.4 06 Dec 2016
- 0.7.3 01 Dec 2016
- 0.7.2 30 Nov 2016
- 0.7.1 11 Nov 2016
- 0.7.0 03 Nov 2016
- 0.6.1 11 Sep 2016
- 0.6.0 11 Sep 2016
- 0.5.0 24 May 2016
- 0.4.0 23 May 2016
- 0.3.1 20 May 2016
- 0.3.0 20 May 2016
| Version | Released | Vulert vulnerabilities | Licence | Fix published | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.21.2 | 20 Jan 2022 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 0.21.1 | 18 Jan 2022 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 0.21.0 | 01 Dec 2021 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 0.20.0 | 21 Oct 2021 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 0.19.7 | 18 Aug 2021 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 0.16.4 | 30 Jul 2021 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 0.19.6 | 15 Jul 2021 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 0.19.5 | 07 Jul 2021 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 0.19.4 | 20 Apr 2021 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 0.19.3 | 11 Apr 2021 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 0.19.2 | 17 Mar 2021 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 0.19.1 | 15 Mar 2021 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 0.19.0 | 15 Jan 2021 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 0.18.0 | 07 Aug 2020 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 0.17.9 | 05 Aug 2020 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 0.17.8 | 20 Jul 2020 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 0.17.7 | 09 Jun 2020 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 0.17.6 | 07 Apr 2020 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 0.17.5 | 24 Mar 2020 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 0.17.4 | 23 Mar 2020 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 0.17.3 | 26 Feb 2020 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 0.17.2 | 17 Jan 2020 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 0.16.3 | 25 Oct 2019 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 0.17.1 | 25 Oct 2019 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 0.16.2 | 25 Sep 2019 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 0.17.0 | 11 Jul 2019 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 0.16.1 | 26 Feb 2019 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 0.16.0 | 08 Jan 2019 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 0.15.0 | 03 Jan 2019 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 0.14.1 | 05 Nov 2018 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 0.14.0 | 17 Sep 2018 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 0.13.0 | 05 Apr 2018 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 0.12.1 | 12 Feb 2018 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 0.12.0 | 27 Jan 2018 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 0.11.0 | 20 Dec 2017 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 0.10.4 | 01 Dec 2017 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 0.10.3 | 07 Sep 2017 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 0.10.2 | 06 Sep 2017 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 0.10.0 | 03 Sep 2017 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 0.9.4 | 22 Jul 2017 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 0.9.3 | 22 Jul 2017 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 0.9.2 | 22 Jul 2017 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 0.9.1 | 22 Jul 2017 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 0.9.0 | 22 Jul 2017 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 0.8.8 | 11 Apr 2017 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 0.8.7 | 21 Mar 2017 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 0.8.6 | 03 Mar 2017 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 0.8.5 | 11 Feb 2017 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 0.8.4 | 11 Feb 2017 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 0.8.3 | 11 Feb 2017 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 0.8.2 | 10 Feb 2017 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 0.8.1 | 09 Feb 2017 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 0.8.0 | 07 Feb 2017 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 0.7.7 | 27 Jan 2017 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 0.7.6 | 16 Jan 2017 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 0.7.5 | 13 Dec 2016 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 0.7.4 | 06 Dec 2016 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 0.7.3 | 01 Dec 2016 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 0.7.2 | 30 Nov 2016 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 0.7.1 | 11 Nov 2016 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 0.7.0 | 03 Nov 2016 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 0.6.1 | 11 Sep 2016 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 0.6.0 | 11 Sep 2016 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 0.5.0 | 24 May 2016 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 0.4.0 | 23 May 2016 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 0.3.1 | 20 May 2016 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 0.3.0 | 20 May 2016 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
All 67 versions Vulert tracks for this package. Severity counts are the vulnerabilities recorded against that exact release.
02 Disclosure history
How often vulnerabilities are recorded
No dated vulnerabilities are recorded for this package yet.
Other ways into the data
03 Vulnerabilities
Recorded vulnerabilities for libp2p-crypto
No vulnerabilities match this view.
Vulnerability wrong, a fix missing, or a package we should cover? Report it and we will fix the record. Report Vulnerability Provide Feedback
Updated: 23/Oct/2026 · Vulnerabilities in our DB: 524315
Questions
About libp2p-crypto
Is libp2p-crypto safe to use?
Vulert has no vulnerabilities on record for libp2p-crypto in npm at this point. That is a good signal rather than a guarantee: new vulnerabilities are published for packages all the time, so the versions you actually run are still worth monitoring.
What is libp2p-crypto's Vulert package health score?
Vulert scores libp2p-crypto 53/100, which reads as usable, but worth attention. The score weighs the vulnerability record (40), maintenance and release cadence (25), adoption from dependents and stars (20) and community signals such as the OpenSSF scorecard and forks (15).
Is the latest version of libp2p-crypto affected?
No. 0.21.2, the version you would install today, has no vulnerabilities on record against it. Earlier releases do — the version table above lists each release with what affects it.
Which version of libp2p-crypto should I use?
0.21.2 is the version Vulert recommends for the affected releases. The version table above lists every release with the vulnerabilities recorded against it, so you can confirm the range you actually run.
How many vulnerabilities does libp2p-crypto have?
0 vulnerabilities are recorded for libp2p-crypto in the npm ecosystem: 0 critical, 0 high, 0 medium and 0 low. The ledger on this page lists the same counts next to the date of the most recent disclosure.
How often are new libp2p-crypto vulnerabilities disclosed?
0 vulnerabilities were recorded for libp2p-crypto in the last 12 months. Recency matters more than a lifetime total: it shows how actively new issues are being disclosed for the package you are considering.
Which versions of libp2p-crypto are affected?
Each vulnerability on this page lists the affected version range and the fixed version to move to. Open the vulnerability for the version you actually run — fixes are specific to a release line, not to the package as a whole.
How do I monitor libp2p-crypto for upcoming vulnerabilities?
Upload the manifest or SBOM for your application at vulert.com/scanner and Vulert keeps checking the libp2p-crypto version you actually run against new disclosures, then alerts you when one affects it. There is no installation and no source-code access required.