Vulnerability Database · npm · Package report
rc-progress: vulnerability history, versions and safety
rc-progress is a package in the npm ecosystem. Vulert holds no vulnerabilities for it yet.
Nothing recorded for this package in the npm ecosystem.
Every vulnerability has a patched version to move to.
No published version shipped hostile code.
Vulert verdict on rc-progress 4.0.0 i
Updated on 23 Oct 2026
Good news: 4.0.0, the version you would install today, has no known vulnerabilities.
- Security Minor issues
- Maintenance Slowing
- Popularity Widely used
- Community Quiet
What to do: Stay on 4.0.0 or newer. This can change: a vulnerability disclosed tomorrow can affect 4.0.0 too — Vulert watches the package and alerts you if that happens. Monitor it with Vulert →
- Current release 4.0.0 — unaffected i
- Vulnerabilities on record 0 i
- Highest CVSS n/a i
- With no published fix 0 i
- Depended on by 9,970 packages i
- Stars 706 i
- OpenSSF scorecard 4/10 i
- Last release 31 months ago i
- Licence MIT i
Version list, release dates, licence and dependants published by the npm registry, refreshed 23 Oct 2026. Licence information is not legal advice.
Concerned about your application's security?
Vulert continues monitoring your dependencies and alerts you when new vulnerabilities are disclosed. No installation and no source-code access required.
01 Versions
Which versions are affected
Every version Vulert tracks for rc-progress, newest first, with the vulnerabilities recorded against each one. A version showing none has no vulnerability in the Vulert database — open it for the full picture on that release.
- 4.0.0 22 Mar 2024
- 3.5.1 24 Aug 2023
- 3.5.0 24 Aug 2023
- 3.4.2 06 Jun 2023
- 3.4.1 31 Oct 2022
- 3.4.0 29 Jun 2022
- 3.3.3 26 May 2022
- 3.3.2 08 May 2022
- 3.3.1 08 May 2022
- 3.3.0 08 May 2022
- 3.2.4 05 Jan 2022
- 3.2.2 24 Dec 2021
- 3.2.1 22 Dec 2021
- 3.2.0 22 Dec 2021
- 3.1.4 17 May 2021
- 3.1.3 08 Jan 2021
- 3.1.2 29 Dec 2020
- 3.1.1 21 Oct 2020
- 3.1.0 01 Sep 2020
- 2.6.1 15 May 2020
- 3.0.0 15 May 2020
- 2.6.0 13 May 2020
- 2.5.3 04 May 2020
- 2.5.2 14 Aug 2019
- 2.5.1 26 Jun 2019
- 2.5.0 26 Jun 2019
- 2.4.1 19 Jun 2019
- 2.4.0 19 Jun 2019
- 2.3.0 18 Jan 2019
- 2.2.7 17 Jan 2019
- 2.2.6 25 Sep 2018
- 2.2.5 27 Nov 2017
- 2.2.4 06 Nov 2017
- 2.2.3 06 Nov 2017
- 2.2.2 04 Aug 2017
- 2.2.1 29 Jun 2017
- 2.2.0 28 Jun 2017
- 2.1.2 22 May 2017
- 2.1.1 21 Apr 2017
- 2.1.0 16 Mar 2017
- 2.0.6 09 Jan 2017
- 2.0.5 07 Jan 2017
- 2.0.3 15 Nov 2016
- 2.0.2 11 Nov 2016
- 2.0.1 25 Aug 2016
- 2.0.0 24 Aug 2016
- 1.0.4 16 Nov 2015
- 1.0.3 14 Jun 2015
- 1.0.2 09 Jun 2015
- 1.0.1 09 Jun 2015
- 1.0.0 30 Apr 2015
| Version | Released | Vulert vulnerabilities | Licence | Fix published | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4.0.0 | 22 Mar 2024 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 3.5.1 | 24 Aug 2023 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 3.5.0 | 24 Aug 2023 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 3.4.2 | 06 Jun 2023 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 3.4.1 | 31 Oct 2022 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 3.4.0 | 29 Jun 2022 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 3.3.3 | 26 May 2022 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 3.3.2 | 08 May 2022 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 3.3.1 | 08 May 2022 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 3.3.0 | 08 May 2022 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 3.2.4 | 05 Jan 2022 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 3.2.2 | 24 Dec 2021 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 3.2.1 | 22 Dec 2021 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 3.2.0 | 22 Dec 2021 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 3.1.4 | 17 May 2021 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 3.1.3 | 08 Jan 2021 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 3.1.2 | 29 Dec 2020 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 3.1.1 | 21 Oct 2020 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 3.1.0 | 01 Sep 2020 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 2.6.1 | 15 May 2020 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 3.0.0 | 15 May 2020 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 2.6.0 | 13 May 2020 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 2.5.3 | 04 May 2020 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 2.5.2 | 14 Aug 2019 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 2.5.1 | 26 Jun 2019 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 2.5.0 | 26 Jun 2019 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 2.4.1 | 19 Jun 2019 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 2.4.0 | 19 Jun 2019 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 2.3.0 | 18 Jan 2019 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 2.2.7 | 17 Jan 2019 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 2.2.6 | 25 Sep 2018 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 2.2.5 | 27 Nov 2017 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 2.2.4 | 06 Nov 2017 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 2.2.3 | 06 Nov 2017 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 2.2.2 | 04 Aug 2017 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 2.2.1 | 29 Jun 2017 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 2.2.0 | 28 Jun 2017 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 2.1.2 | 22 May 2017 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 2.1.1 | 21 Apr 2017 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 2.1.0 | 16 Mar 2017 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 2.0.6 | 09 Jan 2017 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 2.0.5 | 07 Jan 2017 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 2.0.3 | 15 Nov 2016 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 2.0.2 | 11 Nov 2016 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 2.0.1 | 25 Aug 2016 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 2.0.0 | 24 Aug 2016 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 1.0.4 | 16 Nov 2015 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 1.0.3 | 14 Jun 2015 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 1.0.2 | 09 Jun 2015 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 1.0.1 | 09 Jun 2015 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
| 1.0.0 | 30 Apr 2015 | none | MIT | — | Details → |
All 51 versions Vulert tracks for this package. Severity counts are the vulnerabilities recorded against that exact release.
02 Disclosure history
How often vulnerabilities are recorded
No dated vulnerabilities are recorded for this package yet.
Other ways into the data
03 Vulnerabilities
Recorded vulnerabilities for rc-progress
No vulnerabilities match this view.
Vulnerability wrong, a fix missing, or a package we should cover? Report it and we will fix the record. Report Vulnerability Provide Feedback
Updated: 23/Oct/2026 · Vulnerabilities in our DB: 524315
Questions
About rc-progress
Is rc-progress safe to use?
Vulert has no vulnerabilities on record for rc-progress in npm at this point. That is a good signal rather than a guarantee: new vulnerabilities are published for packages all the time, so the versions you actually run are still worth monitoring.
What is rc-progress's Vulert package health score?
Vulert scores rc-progress 69/100, which reads as usable, but worth attention. The score weighs the vulnerability record (40), maintenance and release cadence (25), adoption from dependents and stars (20) and community signals such as the OpenSSF scorecard and forks (15).
Is the latest version of rc-progress affected?
No. 4.0.0, the version you would install today, has no vulnerabilities on record against it. Earlier releases do — the version table above lists each release with what affects it.
Which version of rc-progress should I use?
4.0.0 is the version Vulert recommends for the affected releases. The version table above lists every release with the vulnerabilities recorded against it, so you can confirm the range you actually run.
How many vulnerabilities does rc-progress have?
0 vulnerabilities are recorded for rc-progress in the npm ecosystem: 0 critical, 0 high, 0 medium and 0 low. The ledger on this page lists the same counts next to the date of the most recent disclosure.
How often are new rc-progress vulnerabilities disclosed?
0 vulnerabilities were recorded for rc-progress in the last 12 months. Recency matters more than a lifetime total: it shows how actively new issues are being disclosed for the package you are considering.
Which versions of rc-progress are affected?
Each vulnerability on this page lists the affected version range and the fixed version to move to. Open the vulnerability for the version you actually run — fixes are specific to a release line, not to the package as a whole.
How do I monitor rc-progress for upcoming vulnerabilities?
Upload the manifest or SBOM for your application at vulert.com/scanner and Vulert keeps checking the rc-progress version you actually run against new disclosures, then alerts you when one affects it. There is no installation and no source-code access required.