VulertSecurity VulertSecurity

Vulnerability Database · RubyGems · Package report

phonelib: vulnerability history, versions and safety

phonelib is a package in the RubyGems ecosystem. Vulert holds no vulnerabilities for it yet.

i
0 vulnerabilities recorded

Nothing recorded for this package in the RubyGems ecosystem.

i
0 with no fix published

Every vulnerability has a patched version to move to.

i
0 in the last 12 months

Nothing new recorded in the last year.

See the disclosure history →
i
0 malicious-package vulnerabilities

No published version shipped hostile code.

See all phonelib vulnerabilities

Vulert verdict on phonelib 0.10.28 i

Updated on 23 Oct 2026

Good news: 0.10.28, the version you would install today, has no known vulnerabilities.

Package health score 78/100
  • Security Minor issues
  • Maintenance Sustainable
  • Popularity Widely used
  • Community Quiet

What to do: Stay on 0.10.28 or newer. This can change: a vulnerability disclosed tomorrow can affect 0.10.28 too — Vulert watches the package and alerts you if that happens. Monitor it with Vulert →

  • Current release 0.10.28 — unaffected i
  • Vulnerabilities on record 0 i
  • Highest CVSS n/a i
  • With no published fix 0 i
  • Stars 1,164 i
  • OpenSSF scorecard 2/10 i
  • Last release this month i
  • Licence MIT i

Version list, release dates, licence and dependants published by RubyGems, refreshed 23 Oct 2026. Licence information is not legal advice.

Concerned about your application's security?

Vulert continues monitoring your dependencies and alerts you when new vulnerabilities are disclosed. No installation and no source-code access required.

01 Versions

Which versions are affected

Every version Vulert tracks for phonelib, newest first, with the vulnerabilities recorded against each one. A version showing none has no vulnerability in the Vulert database — open it for the full picture on that release.

i
Version Released Vulert vulnerabilities Licence Fix published Details
0.10.28 20 Oct 2026 none MIT — Details →
0.10.27 26 Aug 2026 none MIT — Details →
0.10.26 26 Aug 2026 none MIT — Details →
0.10.25 18 Aug 2026 none MIT — Details →
0.10.24 11 Aug 2026 none MIT — Details →
0.10.23 27 Jul 2026 none MIT — Details →
0.10.22 12 Jun 2026 none MIT — Details →
0.10.21 02 Jun 2026 none MIT — Details →
0.10.20 12 May 2026 none MIT — Details →
0.10.19 12 May 2026 none MIT — Details →
0.10.18 04 Apr 2026 none MIT — Details →
0.10.17 15 Mar 2026 none MIT — Details →
0.10.16 04 Feb 2026 none MIT — Details →
0.10.15 22 Dec 2025 none MIT — Details →
0.10.14 24 Nov 2025 none MIT — Details →
0.10.13 27 Oct 2025 none MIT — Details →
0.10.12 15 Sep 2025 none MIT — Details →
0.10.11 24 Jul 2025 none MIT — Details →
0.10.10 29 Jun 2025 none MIT — Details →
0.10.9 14 May 2025 none MIT — Details →
0.10.8 23 Apr 2025 none MIT — Details →
0.10.7 07 Apr 2025 none MIT — Details →
0.10.6 12 Mar 2025 none MIT — Details →
0.10.5 24 Feb 2025 none MIT — Details →
0.10.4 10 Feb 2025 none MIT — Details →
0.10.3 16 Dec 2024 none MIT — Details →
0.10.2 15 Dec 2024 none MIT — Details →
0.10.1 20 Nov 2024 none MIT — Details →
0.9.3 27 Oct 2024 none MIT — Details →
0.9.2 08 Sep 2024 none MIT — Details →
0.9.1 17 Jul 2024 none MIT — Details →
0.9.0 17 Jul 2024 none MIT — Details →
0.8.9 02 Jun 2024 none MIT — Details →
0.8.8 16 Mar 2024 none MIT — Details →
0.8.7 18 Jan 2024 none MIT — Details →
0.8.6 17 Dec 2023 none MIT — Details →
0.8.5 05 Nov 2023 none MIT — Details →
0.8.4 26 Sep 2023 none MIT — Details →
0.8.3 19 Aug 2023 none MIT — Details →
0.8.2 05 Jun 2023 none MIT — Details →
0.8.1 11 Apr 2023 none MIT — Details →
0.8.0 04 Apr 2023 none MIT — Details →
0.7.7 04 Feb 2023 none MIT — Details →
0.7.6 25 Dec 2022 none MIT — Details →
0.7.5 27 Nov 2022 none MIT — Details →
0.7.4 19 Oct 2022 none MIT — Details →
0.7.3 19 Sep 2022 none MIT — Details →
0.7.2 07 Sep 2022 none MIT — Details →
0.7.1 02 Aug 2022 none MIT — Details →
0.7.0 08 Jun 2022 none MIT — Details →
0.6.58 04 Apr 2022 none MIT — Details →
0.6.57 23 Feb 2022 none MIT — Details →
0.6.56 23 Feb 2022 none MIT — Details →
0.6.55 10 Jan 2022 none MIT — Details →
0.6.54 09 Nov 2021 none MIT — Details →
0.6.53 25 Aug 2021 none MIT — Details →
0.6.52 31 Jul 2021 none MIT — Details →
0.6.51 13 Jun 2021 none MIT — Details →
0.6.50 01 May 2021 none MIT — Details →
0.6.49 21 Mar 2021 none MIT — Details →
0.6.48 31 Jan 2021 none MIT — Details →
0.6.47 21 Dec 2020 none MIT — Details →
0.6.46 13 Oct 2020 none MIT — Details →
0.6.45 31 Aug 2020 none MIT — Details →
0.6.44 07 Jul 2020 none MIT — Details →
0.6.43 07 Apr 2020 none MIT — Details →
0.6.42 11 Feb 2020 none MIT — Details →
0.6.41 15 Jan 2020 none MIT — Details →
0.6.40 04 Dec 2019 none MIT — Details →
0.6.39 05 Nov 2019 none MIT — Details →
0.6.38 06 Oct 2019 none MIT — Details →
0.6.37 27 Aug 2019 none MIT — Details →
0.6.36 17 Jun 2019 none MIT — Details →
0.6.35 10 Jun 2019 none MIT — Details →
0.6.34 20 May 2019 none MIT — Details →
0.6.33 22 Apr 2019 none MIT — Details →
0.6.32 14 Apr 2019 none MIT — Details →
0.6.31 27 Mar 2019 none MIT — Details →
0.6.30 06 Mar 2019 none MIT — Details →
0.6.29 10 Feb 2019 none MIT — Details →
0.6.28 03 Dec 2018 none MIT — Details →
0.6.27 13 Nov 2018 none MIT — Details →
0.6.26 15 Oct 2018 none MIT — Details →
0.6.25 13 Sep 2018 none MIT — Details →
0.6.24 30 Jul 2018 none MIT — Details →
0.6.23 10 Jul 2018 none MIT — Details →
0.6.22 23 May 2018 none MIT — Details →
0.6.21 12 Apr 2018 none MIT — Details →
0.6.20 03 Apr 2018 none MIT — Details →
0.6.19 04 Mar 2018 none MIT — Details →
0.6.18 21 Dec 2017 none MIT — Details →
0.6.17 28 Nov 2017 none MIT — Details →
0.6.16 09 Oct 2017 none MIT — Details →
0.6.15 17 Sep 2017 none MIT — Details →
0.6.14 17 Sep 2017 none MIT — Details →
0.6.13 06 Aug 2017 none MIT — Details →
0.6.12 03 Jun 2017 none MIT — Details →
0.6.11 17 Apr 2017 none MIT — Details →
0.6.10 01 Mar 2017 none MIT — Details →
0.6.9 18 Jan 2017 none MIT — Details →
0.6.8 28 Nov 2016 none — — Details →
0.6.7 28 Nov 2016 none — — Details →
0.6.6 03 Nov 2016 none — — Details →
0.6.5 25 Aug 2016 none — — Details →
0.6.4 25 Aug 2016 none — — Details →
0.6.3 08 Aug 2016 none — — Details →
0.6.2 14 Jun 2016 none — — Details →
0.6.1 04 Jun 2016 none — — Details →
0.6.0 20 Apr 2016 none — — Details →
0.5.6 07 Mar 2016 none — — Details →
0.5.5 16 Jan 2016 none — — Details →
0.5.4 03 Nov 2015 none — — Details →
0.5.2 07 Oct 2015 none — — Details →
0.5.1 07 Oct 2015 none — — Details →
0.5.0 04 Sep 2015 none — — Details →
0.4.9 28 Jul 2015 none — — Details →
0.4.8 27 Jul 2015 none — — Details →
0.4.7 18 Jun 2015 none — — Details →
0.4.6 10 May 2015 none — — Details →
0.4.5 03 May 2015 none — — Details →

The newest 120 of 148 versions Vulert tracks. Severity counts are the vulnerabilities recorded against that exact release.

02 Disclosure history

How often vulnerabilities are recorded

No dated vulnerabilities are recorded for this package yet.

03 Vulnerabilities

Recorded vulnerabilities for phonelib

No vulnerability write-ups match this view

Search all 0 in the database →

No vulnerabilities match this view.

Vulnerability wrong, a fix missing, or a package we should cover? Report it and we will fix the record. Report Vulnerability Provide Feedback

Updated: 23/Oct/2026 · Vulnerabilities in our DB: 524315

Subscribe to Vulert on Telegram
Daily digest of new CVEs, critical and high severity, affected packages and fixes — plus a weekly roundup.
Join the channel →

Questions

About phonelib

Is phonelib safe to use?

Vulert has no vulnerabilities on record for phonelib in RubyGems at this point. That is a good signal rather than a guarantee: new vulnerabilities are published for packages all the time, so the versions you actually run are still worth monitoring.

What is phonelib's Vulert package health score?

Vulert scores phonelib 78/100, which reads as in good shape. The score weighs the vulnerability record (40), maintenance and release cadence (25), adoption from dependents and stars (20) and community signals such as the OpenSSF scorecard and forks (15).

Is the latest version of phonelib affected?

No. 0.10.28, the version you would install today, has no vulnerabilities on record against it. Earlier releases do — the version table above lists each release with what affects it.

How many vulnerabilities does phonelib have?

0 vulnerabilities are recorded for phonelib in the RubyGems ecosystem: 0 critical, 0 high, 0 medium and 0 low. The ledger on this page lists the same counts next to the date of the most recent disclosure.

How often are new phonelib vulnerabilities disclosed?

0 vulnerabilities were recorded for phonelib in the last 12 months. Recency matters more than a lifetime total: it shows how actively new issues are being disclosed for the package you are considering.

Which versions of phonelib are affected?

Each vulnerability on this page lists the affected version range and the fixed version to move to. Open the vulnerability for the version you actually run — fixes are specific to a release line, not to the package as a whole.

How do I monitor phonelib for upcoming vulnerabilities?

Upload the manifest or SBOM for your application at vulert.com/scanner and Vulert keeps checking the phonelib version you actually run against new disclosures, then alerts you when one affects it. There is no installation and no source-code access required.